Digital BW, The Print

In a message dated 9/29/2003 2:09:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
anthony@... writes:
Additionally, as you point out, LF doesn't have the convenience of 35mm.
But once you've shot a larger format, you tend to lust for it in _all_
photos, not just the photos for which it can be practically used.  So
everything less looks a bit disappointing in comparison, no matter what the
shooting situation.
i totally agree with this as well

i have been shooting MF film for about 7 months now, and i simply cannot go
back to 35mm any longer! and i too cannot afford LF equipment, so i don't even
want to see what a LF print looks like in real life :)

k a y


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]