At 06:42 PM Thursday 10/2/03, you wrote: (re Portra) >The stuff scans amazingly well, the only >complaint I have is less contrast then I like. I rate it at 250 and get it >processed locally. Clients like getting 4x6 prints. I used to use 400CN >but think the Portra BW to have a better look. I have scanned some T400CN negs from about three years ago and haven't been able to extract much shadow detail - I've never found this with ordinary film and wonder if it could be caused by the negs fading a bit, although they've been properly stored. >There is also Kodak Black & White Select, which I only used once and it >seemed good, much like Portra rather then 400CN. If in fact it is the >consumer version, I should use it because its cheaper. Oddly enough, as it's the consumer version, I've found that the sorts of shops that do sell it, do so at a higher price than T400CN and the pro shops I've tried only have T400CN and neither of the others:-\ thanks, Richard ------------------------------ photos: http://photos.smallfield.vze.com homepage: http://smallfield.vze.com favourite website: http://www.masters-of-photography.com/ "Ask her to wait a moment - I am almost done. " --Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855), while working, when informed that his wife is dying.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] re: C-41 BW films for scanning
2003-10-03 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.