Could you elaborate a little on how the Moab paper compares to Epson velvet fine art in texture and brightness? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > I just printed some Moab Entrada Fine Art Natural 190. It is another cotton > paper with no optical brighteners, and the price at Inkjetgoodies might make > it about the most affordable cotton paper (now that Eclipse Satine is gone). > > There are also 300 weight and brightened versions of this paper. > > The paper looks a lot like the new Epson/PremierArt paper. The "natural," > no OB surface is, nonetheless, very bright, measuring a visual 0.02, with > yellow up 0.02, giving it a bit of a creamy appearance. The paper has the > same dmax of 1.60-1.62 with the 1280, UltraTone inks, Eboni black at 1440 > (white paper under the test sheet when reading the density). > > The UltraSmooth/PremierArt curves just posted seemed to be very close to > what this paper needs. > > I don't think they are the same paper, however. The Entrada has some > roughness in the shadow tones, and I did have some flaking of the surface. > > So, as just a very initial reaction, I'd say its another good cotton paper > option and a worthy replacement for Eclipse Satine. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Moab Entrada paper
2003-10-10 by digikdm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.