Matthew, You can purchase a set of carts for the 2200 that are loaded with the UT inkset from MIS. I posted a couple of months ago with info on curves for QTR using the UT inks in the 2200 here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/34084 Also, Bowhaus has developed some IJC/OPM profiles for MIS to use with the UT inks in the 2200. Carl On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 08:41 AM, Matthew Born wrote: > Hi Tom, > Thanks for your thoughts. Admittedly, I'm comparing apples to oranges > to > some extent: different ink sets and different drivers. But I'm > comparing the > two machines at what I consider to be their best B&W-specific > arrangement, > not necessarily just an out-of-the-box from Epson comparison. I > realize many > consider the pricier rips the way to go, but I am intrigued by IJC's > potential (not to mention OPM's price) and am kind of sitting in that > camp > on the 2200 right now. The 2200 was driven by OPM, which does not have > user > adjustable output for the dpi. Judging by the speed, though, it's > pretty > clearly going at the 1440 setting. The image itself is 720dpi and > 16bit. > There are no alignment issues on the 1280 -- I very carefully aligned > it, > using a loupe to make the best choices, right before I ran out these > prints. > Paul's note with the curves for the UT set say he saw no difference, at > least on EEM, using the 2880 setting on the 1280, and his judgment on > that > matter is good enough for me. Besides, even if the additional dpi made > up > the difference, the extra time and ink cost (at 2880 vs. 1440) still > makes > it a poorer choice. Frankly, I'm leaning towards reversing my setup; > using > the postscript software to run the 1280 for my design work, and using > the > 2200 as my B&W photo printer. One of these days, there'll be empty > cartridges for the 2200 available, and somebody a lot smarter than I > will > develop good curves using IJC and an inkset like the UT ones. That > would > make a mean B&W machine. Hey, Paul has lots of free time on his hands > :) > > Cheers, > Matthew Born
Message
Re: [Digital BW] UT inks, 1280 vs. 2200
2003-10-11 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.