Paul, thanks for your work on the Moab profiles. I will definitely give them a run on the Satine ASAP. I'm also going to try a print on the 1280 @ 2880 just for kicks. The difference in sharpness between the 2200 and 1280 is subtle, but it is indeed visible to the naked eye. One of my (web, not photo) clients noticed it with no prompting, right down to the tiny detail I thought most clearly showed the difference. Printing at 2880 might send the profiles kablooey, but it would be interesting to see if it can make any difference in the sharpness. I kind of doubt it, at least on matte paper. I'm leaning towards using the UT inks in the 2200 now. Matthew Born
Message
UT inks, 1280, Moab
2003-10-12 by Matthew Born
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.