Michele, I think you should follow Steadman's advice and do some research before you decide. There is a big difference between 35mm (Nikon, Canon) and medium format (like the Mamiya). Part of it will depend on your shooting style - do you plan to work in a studio on a tripod with controlled lighting or hand-held? Medium format cameras are large, heavy and more suited to use on a tripod though they can be used without one. Tripods mean a more contemplative, controlled style as opposed to shooting the fleeting "decisive moment" as one famous 35mm photographer called it. How big will your cusotmary enlargements be? If you want huge prints then medium format negs will give you more info/detail than 35mm, and can be made larger as a rule - though film type/speed is also a factor - but medium format scanners cost a lot more than even the best 35mm filmscanners. I imagine any of your stated choices will have a soft focus lens available if you want it (or you can make your own with a clear glass filter and some vaseline) though you can achieve the same quality - with possibly greater control - on the scanned file in Photoshop. As for suggestions on filmscanners first you gotta decide what format negs and slides you will be feeding it. Cheers, Nina >do you know any good brands of film scanners to look for? > > also - I was thinking of foregoing the used cameras and opting for a >newer one - what do you know about these: > > Mamiya RB67 (or the 645 series) > Nikon F5 or N90 > Cannon EOS (Elan, 2000, 2000 QD, or the 1,3, or 5 model) > > i want one that is compatible with a soft focus lens and i know the >mamiya is, but I am not sure of the difference in 35mm and medium formats >for portrait/model work.
Message
Re: Nina - WAS Re: any dig. users familiar with these 35mm???
2001-10-06 by ncm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.