Thanks for posting the interesting observations.
I especially liked your comment on the editions. Too few and no one sees it. How many is too much?
How about the "limited edition prints" that people buy like crazy nowadays...they generally come in editions of 1200 or so...the low limit of offset printers of fine art REPRODUCTIONS...you know..the "Painter of Light" whats his name...Thomas something...(grin) who by the way has sold millions of dollars of limited edition prints and is very successful "commercially."
Steadman.
----- Original Message -----
From: lyonscox@...
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 6:54 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] A note on Gallery Rules or editions
I've had some interesting conversations about editions and gallery
rules.
Regarding Existing Work.
Was talking with a curator at the Getty once about Edward Weston's
work. How many Pepper #30's are there? There are # of known prints
and I immediately threw out 3x that number as a reasonable possible
number of images that could come to light in the next 50 years.
A parallel. Collectors of 35mm cameras can still find amazing things
because the first generation of buyers can still be in possession of
them. It seems reasonable that many things pass through two hands,
if not two generations, before they come to the light of a
museum/collector.
Regarding Editions.
How many is enough? Unless you sell work, an edition is
meaningless. An edition is meaningless if it isn't fully produced.
An edition is meaningless if it keeps your work so rare that people
can't see it, now, or 200 years from now. Vermeer might be the
exception but it took several hundred years to grab the populations
interest at large.
Seems a lot of early 20th Century art, I'm thinking German
Expressionists in particular, had editions upwards of 100. Enough
for people to see them in a number of museums around the world.
Enough so they get published. Still not enough to have saturated
collections around the world.
Regarding Descriptions of artwork.
This is an outgrowth of curatorial work. The need to describe
something in words so it can be recognized when pulled out of the box
(& match the accession#). Computer assisted art, printed through
inkjet printers is not a lot different than woodblock, etching,
lithography, or photography. All of these processes were new at the
time, many were UTILIZED by artists for traits they showed to
advantage. This, sometime after the commercial world had it long
enough for artists to get access to.
Cleavis in AZ
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] A note on Gallery Rules or editions
2001-10-07 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.