I recently tried a recommendation from Paul Schrantz in the "Matering Digital Photography" piece from PhotoTechniques. Basically, take a grayscale image, convert to RGB and print in the ColorMatch color space. Appearantly the limited gamut of Colorspace helps. It worked better than the gray balancer and dot gain curves for me and seems pretty neutral to my admittedly ameteur eye. I'm working with EAM. It is easy and worth trying. Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "gdicrocco" <gdicrocco@e...> wrote: > > After following a recommendation about the Ilford Smooth Pearl paper, I have made > some decent b/w prints. However, they are not truly b/w. They have a very slight > sepia/brownish tone. > > Is it possible to get excellent b/w prints from the standard Ultrachrome inkset? I > admire and respect all of the customization techniques, ie Paul's curves and UT or > Quad inks, which I'm not familiar with, but why can't I trust my own photoshop levels > and curves with the standard inks and get some good results? > > What's the point of borderless printing or minimized margins if the print quality > stinks at the edge of the image (at least on a portrait orientation). > > What is the best paper to use to get the equivalent of a nice fiber print? The Velvet > Fine Art is not smooth like a traditional fiber. > > Thanks, > > glen
Message
Re: Epson 2200 frustrations
2003-10-23 by markjamesfisher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.