That was my original thought some months ago. But, the inksets that Paul is working toward are certainly different enough from other 'ink jet' inksets, that they need some differentiation in terminology. "Carbon" seems to be descriptive, and sets these inksets apart from other inkjet inksets. Got a better idea? Tom Baker Tim Atherton <timatherton@...> wrote: an amusing if somewhat sad thread here: "Anybody else getting heartburn with the new 'Carbon Print' ? But am I just being a curmudgeon for thinking that calling an inkjet print a 'carbon print' is just a little disingenuous? There is a 100+ years of a traditionally accepted meaning of the phrase 'carbon print', and to have this term co-opted in the interest of avoiding 'calling a spade a spade' just seems shameful...." more: http://www.largeformatphotography.info/lfforum/thread.php?topic=496940 Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-30 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.