Absolutely! I happen to do both digital printing (Colorspan 11 color Quad Blk) and true Carbon printing. I can¹t believe that the group would want to use the same term. It may be of some interest to note in this regard that traditional Carbon printing generally does not use Carbon Black as a pigment. Monochrome images are usually mixtures of ³permanent² watercolor pigments in gelatin forming tones by varying thickness of this suspension coated on watercolor paper. See my site if interested in technical stuff www.jvee.com On 10/30/03 10:43 AM, "Tim Atherton" <timatherton@theedge.ca> wrote: > an amusing if somewhat sad thread here: > > "Anybody else getting heartburn with the new 'Carbon Print' ? > > But am I just being a curmudgeon for thinking that calling an inkjet print a > 'carbon print' is just a little disingenuous? There is a 100+ years of a > traditionally accepted meaning of the phrase 'carbon print', and to have > this term co-opted in the interest of avoiding 'calling a spade a spade' > just seems shameful...." > -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-30 by J Vee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.