Some wise person wrote: "That was my original thought some months ago. But, the inksets that Paul is working toward are certainly different enough from other 'ink jet' inksets, that they need some differentiation in terminology. "Carbon" seems to be descriptive, and sets these inksets apart from other inkjet inksets. Got a better idea?" I attended the Affordable Art Fair opening here in Manhattan Wednesday, and a Manhattan B+W photo dealer, Laurence Miller, had two handsome B+W prints, 13x40 each, on display described as "pigment prints." When I asked Miller if that meant "inkjet," he claimed not to know the exact technology but said it was a "new process" and that the artist was working exclusively in the medium. Read: It's inkjet. Anyone want to follow Miller's lead and call them pigment prints? Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by sandersm@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.