Mark,
Much of this was discussed in depth in the PiezoBW forum back in about May of 2001. Search the forum archives and you will find many postings that will address your concerns. As I recall the subject was "Object d' art" or something like that.
Rest assured you are not alone in your concern. Nor are there any easy answers.
Regarding the ink choice...if you are concerned about the buyer or gallery owner being concerned about "inkjet" permanence, I suggest you change from dye based inkset to a pigment based inkset. Otherwise, buy the Epson line and just point them to the big Epson marketing pitch for their 200 year claims etc..
Also, I suggest sticking with 100% rag papers that are acid free. Pigments and Acid Free is the way to go in my opinion.
Ink is ink. Dye is a component of most inks. Pigment is a component of few. Join the few, the proud, the pigment printmakers!
Of course since you are a commercial photographer who may need a wider gamut inkset for prints that have a short term use, then dye based sets are probably the way to go for proofs for offset images.
Good luck and keep posting.
Steadman
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Tucker
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Lenswork Issue (Our New Slogan)
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Carolyn Frayn
<carolyn@u...> wrote:
> Mark, are we free to use this wittecism on our web sites??!! ;-)
> Wonderful!!!
Fine to use anything I write. But since I write with dyes instead of
pigments, you'd better cut'n'paste pretty fast. By tomorrow, that
post will probably be hard to read.
----
I know we're all kidding around about this, but seriously, am I the
only one that's concerned, or is getting this weird vibe when I
mention that they're inkjet prints?
I know that all this is temporary; someday, one day, hopefully all
inks will be at least pigment, if not something much better that
hasn't even been invented yet. And I know that since I work with
MIS dyes, I'm even more sensitive to it (but at least my prints
aren't green by the window any more).
From all these suggestions, I like anything with the word
"carbon" in it. Carbon has that connotation like it's the oldest
substance on the entire planet. Carbon is Biblical. Carbon is The
Book of Genesis. My issue is that I don't think MIS color dyes
contain carbon; I think you guys are talking about Piezo inks
having carbon. So again, I'm left behind.
What about "Photographic dye ink on watercolor paper"? Is that
too wordy? I like the word "ink"; ink sounds long-lasting, like the
Declaration of Independence. "Dye" sounds like Rit Dye, which
doesnt' sound permanent.
But I honestly DO think that conversations like this are healthy;
just to keep this permance/language thing in the forefront.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dye vs Pigment and Other Inkjet Concerns: was Slogan etc..
2001-10-07 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.