At 01:39 PM 10/30/03 -0800, you wrote: >Absolutely! I happen to do both digital printing (Colorspan 11 color Quad >Blk) and true Carbon printing. I can¹t believe that the group would want to >use the same term. It may be of some interest to note in this regard that >traditional Carbon printing generally does not use Carbon Black as a >pigment. Monochrome images are usually mixtures of ³permanent² watercolor >pigments in gelatin forming tones by varying thickness of this suspension >coated on watercolor paper. See my site if interested in technical stuff >www.jvee.com Jvee, I enjoyed your web page - loverly work! Unlike the conventionally sought air-dried, silver print Holy Grail I am on a quest for the fine art print look such as your carbon prints. Do you feel you have reached that with your quad output? By that I mean surface, material quality, authority - not necessarily similarity in appearance to carbon prints. AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book, 2nd ed. NOW SHIPPING http://www.panoramacamera.us
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W dissing
2003-10-31 by Alan Zinn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.