Martin Wesley wrote: > <snip> about Lenswork > So they are rather hypocritical in my eye and their arguments that > photogravure is much more beautiful than inkjet have as much value as > the silver vs. inkjet, or the platinum vs. silver, or oil painting > vs. watercolor, color vs. B&W, etc. For a long time I was enamored with photo gravure prints (and I still think good ones *are* beautiful), but when I spoke with my dealer about us doing them, he stated, unequivocally, that photo gravures sell for *way* less than silver prints...And that this was even true of the Robert Maplethorpe gravures. I did some further investigating and found that he was right. How odd....Again, commerce, not art. Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC PS: An artist friend of ours who was doing photo gravures, is switching to inkjet prints after playing with our Epson 2000P, PS, and computer. She is now looking into getting an Epson 7000! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Gavure vs. Inkjet etc. Was ,Lenswork Special Editions
2001-10-07 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.