Hmmm... Who was it who was thinking of "paleo-prints" for the carbon quadtones? Thought people might enjoy a little bit of the still ongoing exchange on Carbon pigment inkjet prints vs. traditional carbon prints from the LF list: QUOTE: "Some great info at this link: http://webexhibits.org/pigments/intro/early.htm From which comes this: "Historians hypothesize that paint was applied by brushing, smearing, dabbing and spraying techniques. Large areas were covered with fingertips or pads of lichen or moss. Twigs produced drawn or linear marks, while feathers blended areas of color. Brushes made from horse hair were used for paint application and outlining. Paint spraying, accomplished by blowing paint through hollow bones, yielded a finely grained distribution of pigment, like airbrush." Hmmm, it DOES appear that the Giclee was around earlier than 'carbon printing'... oh, about 30,000 years earlier. Guess Katherine will have to come up with some more 'distinctions'! >Look. I was making digital prints when some of you were probably in grade >school. This isn't about Neanderthals refusing to admit that the world is >changing, it's simply about calling things by their right names. Guess you better get to work--maybe on some 'post-paleolithic-carbon-UV-frame-prints'. You wouldn't want your buyers to feel as if you were 'obscuring' names in order to 'fool' them."
Message
Carbon "inkjet" (giclee) images found to carbon photographic prints
2003-11-07 by Tim Atherton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.