I have not been any more impressed with Genuine Fractals than any other iterpolation scheme... others swear by it... If your driver does use nearest neighbor interpolation you *should* gain a lot by upsampling yourself. Image Print uses bicubic. Don't know exactly what Canon or Epson uses. I have not seen any noticable improvement upsampling before sending images to my 1160... but I haven't spent that much time testing it since I am generally happy with what I get and managing huge files isn't much fun on my 3 year old computer. The main advantage that I can see to upsampling before printing is that you get a chance to sharpen your interpolated image and then more or less print exactly what you send your printer instead of letting the driver do it's magic. Here is a sales pitch from QImage that seems compelling: http://www.ddisoftware.com/qimage/quality/ but even using their software, my friend can't really show any *real world* proof that you will get better prints using this technique. No interpolation scheme is going to be *better* for all images and all higher order interpolation schemes *soften* your image. mark ... > > My question is...the images from my Canon A80 routinely show as 180ppi > > when shown full size in Photoshop. I would like to print them at a > > higher resolution, but same number of inches. Does it do any good to > > resample for higher resolution? ...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Any Advantage to Resampling for More Pixels?
2003-11-08 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.