I just > wonder if using a multi-tone B&W inkset on a 1280 makes a corresponding > "leap" to the next level? Robert, yes it does, if you are comparing to the 2200 using only the black and one gray. Two inks will not make as nice a print as 3 or 4 (6 is overkill). For what you are doing you will be perfectly well served with the 1280, considering it's cheaper than the 2200, though also slower. If your profile for the 1280 is dead on, the prints will be as good as they can get. You can use the extra 2 positions for toners, too. I'd say it's more about accurate profiles than inherent printer or ink technology (except for the speed thing). The other thing about using the OEM inks on the 2200 is that they produce a very warm print which you have to balance with Cyan and Magenta. Not an elegant solution compared to inksets that already have a color you like, plus toners that are not of an extreme primary color. Of course you can use the MIS UT sets int the 2200, but then it doesn't matter which printer you use. Antonis
Message
Re: B&W on 2200 (w/QTR) vs 1280 (w/QTR + MIS)- which is best?
2003-11-15 by Antonis Ricos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.