Digital BW, The Print

At 07:42 AM 11/23/03 +0000, you wrote:
>No, I'll say it with respect to 2200 output.  It
>isn't "photographic."  It may work with some images, but it will read
>more like a photographic etching than a photograph.  My eyes aren't
>that good anymore (after turning 40), but I can clearly see the dots.

Mark,

I'm biased towards silver prints myself but I would  amend "isn't 
'photographic' " to read "it isn't a silver print."
Side by side differences stand out between most any (un-glazed) 
photographic media and it is usually clear to me which is a compromise 
choice.  Given an original contact print or a gravure ( by someone like 
Strand) - which would you pick?

AZ

Build a Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book, 2nd ed.
NOW SHIPPING
http://www.panoramacamera.us