Bob, I'm in the middle of a OEM/UT conversion myself. I working with a 2200, using QTR/Linux. The results are great, and I prefer them to the OEM inks, though the OEM results with QTR are surprisingly good. I love the range of tones possible with the UT inks and the curve blending feature of QTR. I have switched carts between OEM Epson and UT with zero clogging problems because of the ink switch. I haven't ever done a full 7-cart OEM/MIS switch, just switching individual carts to verify nozzle check results. I don't know what to tell you about full-set swapping. I know others do it, but I haven't any experience with that yet. I have had some problems with getting perfect nozzle checks with the UT's in place, not from clogging but from bubbles or foam in the UT carts. I'm waiting to write up a final report on my conversion experience until I get going with refilling; the refillable carts from MIS just arrived this afternoon. Here's some quick & dirty notes, based on my experience with one printer. (1) DON'T shake the MIS carts before you install them. Epson says to do this, but MIS recommends against it for the thinner UT's inks. I had a bad out of the box experience with the UT's (I think) because I did a shakedown on them, as was my habit. No more. (2) Make sure you store the UT carts outlet-port down. Open the box and check to make sure they are oriented correctly. (3) Expect to have to wait several hours or overnight after installing the carts before you'll get a clean nozzle check; this allows bubbles & foam to clear. Run cleaning/nozzle checks if you want, but be prepared for this. But waiting for things to settle has always got me a clean nozzle check, at the expense of my patience. (4) Understand what repeated cleanings do; doing > 3 cleanings without printing an "purge" image (not just a nozzle check) puts the firmware back into "short clean" mode. It was my experience, and MIS confirmed this, that the short cleanings often make a nearly-good nozzle check very bad again. (5) If you just can't get a clean nozzle check, you can reassure yourself that everything is okay by putting an Epson cart back in place. Every time I've done this, the nozzle check for that position is instantly perfect. This is why I'm convinced my nozzle checks we're "clogs" but foam in the carts. Hope this is some help. As I say, I think the results are fantastic. The conversion does take some patience, though. Don't do it now if you need prints tomorrow :-) -David --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Robert Young <rcyoung@a...> wrote: > Before I stick the UT quadtone B&W MIS inks in my 2200, I just want to > verify among the current users, that they have not encountered any > clogging/etc problems when changing back and forth between the Epson > pigmented color inks and the MIS inks that are specifically for use > with the Quadtone RIP software ( see > http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/ultratone.html) ? > > Although I would prefer to dedicate a printer to purely B&W, I need to > show it really makes that much of an improvement before I can fork out > the extra $$$ on another printer. Hence the ink switching with the > current printer while I test things out for a few months. > > Are there any precautions/extra maintenance steps I should take in > using the two inks in the same printer? > > bob young
Message
Re: Epson OEM and MIS UT/Quadtone inks
2003-11-28 by David Wroblewski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.