> Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:52:28 -0800 > From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...> > Subject: RE: Re: RGB Convert to Grayscale > >> From: Anthony G. Atkielski [mailto:anthony@...] >> >> RGB is worse because it collapses all the spectral energy of the >> original scene into just three numbers. There is no way to restore that >> spectral distribution from those three numbers. True black and white >> capture (be it electronic or film) captures an image as a function of >> the continuous spectral sensitivity of the capture medium and the >> continuous spectral emission of the image being recorded. There is no >> way to simulate that continuous function with just three numbers. So >> there exists an infinity of black and white scenes that cannot be >> accurately reproduced using a conversion from RGB. > > Excuse me, but black and white film "collapses all the spectral energy of > the original scene" into just one number. > > In theory, you can certainly acheive results with a narrowband filter in > front of B&W film that cannot be attained precisely by using an RGB sensor > and Photoshop. However, there are some practical problems: > > 1) You only get one particular result with a particular filter. Once it's in > the B&W domain, you've lost all ability to make adjustments to anything but > the grayscale. > > 2) You can't see the results of your filter choice until hours later. > > 3) The commercial filters used for B&W photography aren't narrowband anyway. > The blue and green ones are no more narrowband than the filters in a > digicam. The red and yellow ones are actually low-pass filters. > > You may indeed like the results you get with filters and B&W film, but > there's no ground on which to argue that these results are unquestionably > superior or more correct, or contain more information. Paul, He isn't arguing in order to prove you _wrong_... he is arguing with you because he wants to _argue_. This is a guy who argued on USENET for days that you can get a better understanding of the optical performance of a particular lens by reading the manufacturer's MTF curves over actually using the lens. He doesn't do B/W inkjet printing--he is here to fan the flames. Look at the archives for the other capture spats-- you will see his posts, ad nauseum. Oh yeah, you might want to ask if he actually has any experience with digital capture... Jon
Message
Atkielski's Pathos (was: RE: Re: RGB Convert to Grayscale)
2003-11-29 by Jon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.