At 09:53 PM 11/29/03 -0800, you wrote: >I have been doing chemical B & W photography for many years. Trying hard >not to be a luddite I decided I needed to become open to digital >concepts. I remain open. Digital cameras have reached a point where I can >do most of the same kind of things I do with a traditional film >camera. The advantage no film processing. Now we get to the nub of my >dilemana. I know I can make photoshop do magical things that will allow me >to replicate the kind of techniques I do in a darkroom. The problem for me >seems to come at the printing stage. I've been reading along with the many >thoughtful and highly technical experiments that folks discuss here. As >near as I can understand what folks have experienced and what they are >doing the consensus is: You cannot replicate a chemical darkroom with a >traditional printer without tweaking many different aspects of inks, ink >jets etc. As I read deeper I hear folks talking a lot about trials using >these inks that involve multiple cleaning of ink delivery jets. If all of >this is true, I just cannot see myself switching from chemical to digital >at this time. >Am I reading things correctly? I don't really enjoy mixing chemicals. My >joy comes when, as a result of chemical mixing and the magic of the >projector I create something that hints at what I imagined. Then I'm in >heaven. >Cleaning printer heads just doesn't do it for me. >So I guess my question is: Is there a stock off the shelf printer with >stock off the shelf ink supply in nifty little plug in modules that will >allow me to come close to duplicating my dark room work assuming that I've >done a good job in the image capture and photoshop manipulation. >If the answer is no, I'm quite willing to go back to the dark room and wait. >Thanks for reading. > > >Derek Hamlet >Victoria, B.C. >592-8590 Derek, First, a reminder that you are likely to see a lot more posts about problems with B/W printing than anything else. Many people have almost no problems with clogs, etc. Second, you are fortunate to be making the leap from the dark at a time when great advances in the craft have been made - see Clayton's comments a couple days ago. You have at least three excellent and proven ways to test digital printing: Black only on a 1280 or 2200 printer, Piezography - a turn-key process, or the Paul Roark (or similar) curves which take a little more savvy. In each case there is a wealth of expert help and opinion on this list, the Epson printer list, and the Pieziography list. Good luck, AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book, 2nd ed. NOW SHIPPING http://www.panoramacamera.us
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Moving from Chemical to Digital
2003-11-30 by Alan Zinn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.