It has more to do what the correct speed of the film rather than over exposure. If you calibrate your film to a "gray scale" you will find with most cameras, light meters and developer combinations most film are over rated by one stop. So the true speed of Tri-X is really 200 (180 for sheet film). I've started using TFX-2 and with that developer Trix-X is a little faster about 250. Truman Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > Clayton Jones writes: > > > ... I was dissatisfied and kept coming back to good old Tri-X at 200 > > (or 180 for the 4x5/320 stuff), with D-76 or HC-110. > > What's the advantage to the considerable overexposure, and how much do > you adjust development to account for it? I've always exposed and > developed as on the box; does something improve with overexposure. > > I like everything about Tri-X except the grain (in 35mm--in larger > formats grain is much less of an issue). If there is a way of > preserving everything overall but reducing grain, that would be very > cool. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.