> So it would seem that exposing Tri-X at the rated 400 gives better > range, no? > > Any idea why Tri-X Pan Professional in 120 size is rated at ISO 320 > instead of ISO 400? And sheet sizes - it's basically a different film which just happens to have the same name tim
Message
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-04 by Tim Atherton