Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?

2003-12-04 by Tim Atherton

> So it would seem that exposing Tri-X at the rated 400 gives better
> range, no?
>
> Any idea why Tri-X Pan Professional in 120 size is rated at ISO 320
> instead of ISO 400?

And sheet sizes - it's basically a different film which just happens to have
the same name

tim

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.