<snip> I thought the whole point of purchasing Archival quality matting products was because this won1t happen. The glass is good for preventing dust and spills but does not provide an airtight environment... Steve Steve, Do you think prints can be displayed without the mats deteriorating in a short time? I checked with a friend of mine who has been framing for over thirty years and has clients like Gallo Wine. He says that in a museum which very carefully controls humidity and temperature, a mounted print without glazing of any kind could last 30-50 years. But, in an average home because the environment is not carefully controlled, you will experience damage in as little as two years because of the humity and temperature variations, and the dust we've all seen in the air at a slide show. For greatest logevity, he says, you should glaze and before putting the whole thing together the acrylic or glass should be siliconed and also the back of the frame should have a acid free barrier paper which is also siliconed. That, he says, will not make the frame absolutely airtight but it will prevent dust and other contaminants from attacking any part of your art work. This sounds very reasonable to me. What do you think? This framer does beautiful framing! Thanks for your imput. Joe D
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Premier Semi-gloss, Semi-matte &PremierArt Print Shield
2003-12-14 by Joe Davajon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.