I agree except that it is nice to use a matt to offset (?) the print in the frame somewhat. I personally find the front matt to be more aesthetically appealing. The question is whether a with matt/no glass combination is worse than a without matt/no glass combination. Steve From: Mitch Alland <malland@...> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:55:24 +0700 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Grail, Double Standard, etc. <snip> The purpose of a mat is to keep the glass from touching the surface of the print. If there is a protective coating of the print and there is no glass no mat is necessary: the print can be displayed like an oil painting. One way would be to mount the print on an aluminum sheet, or on foam core. --Mitch/Bangkok [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Grail, Double Standard, etc.
2003-12-14 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.