As long as the copyright is on the back of the print I don't mind. However, I would not buy a print with a copyright notice on the front - even if it were matted and under the matt. I might want to change how the print was displayed. The image belongs to the artist, but the print is mine. I do like to see the artist signature under the image on the paper. If the print is matted I like the matt cut large enough to display the signature. Truman Mark Hahn wrote: > with fine art paintings or prints, no one ever uses a copyright > symbol or words... don't think it looks good on a photo either. > Whether you use a visible signature is a personal choice which some > people feel strongly about either one way or the other. Think people > should worry more about selling prints than worrying about copyright > infringement. > > mark >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Signature & copyright
2003-12-20 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.