Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > >Congress went overboard long ago. Current copyright protection is >extremely restrictive and excessive. Something more like patent and >trademark protection might be better, with a much shorter term for >copyright. Nobody needs copyright protection after he is dead, for >example. > > > Agreed on both counts, for once Anthony.. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act (while probably well-intentioned) has made it far worse though... What a mess.. The ridiculous, but wholly legally supportable, lawsuits based on the DMCA are a bad joke... I could put a bunch of links here.. But I'm sure many have already heard about the Lexmark / Static Control case, Diebold and voting machines, the SunnComm case where they threatened to sue a graduate student for publishing that their copy portection was defeated by holding down the left shift key, and Habeas Inc using the DMCA to add an anti-spam haiku to e-mail headers, etc.. If not, there's enough here to find them yourself via Google.. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Copyright
2003-12-20 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.