Digital BW, The Print

yup, as I said, it's a personal choice... for some types of prints it 
looks good, on others it doesn't...

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Truman Prevatt 
<tprevatt@m...> wrote:
> As long as the copyright is on the back of the print I don't mind. 
> However, I would not buy a print with a copyright notice on the 
front - 
> even if it were matted and under the matt. I might want to change 
how 
> the print was displayed. The image belongs to the artist, but the 
print 
> is mine. I do like to see the artist signature under the image on 
the 
> paper. If the print is matted I like the matt cut large enough to 
> display the signature.
> 
> Truman
> 
> Mark Hahn wrote:
> 
> > with fine art paintings or prints, no one ever uses a copyright
> > symbol or words... don't think it looks good on a photo either. 
> > Whether you use a visible signature is a personal choice which 
some
> > people feel strongly about either one way or the other.  Think 
people
> > should worry more about selling prints than worrying about 
copyright
> > infringement.
> >
> > mark
> >