I think you are probably right that the Epson driver prints black text with black ink only. Paul's test should probably be to scale the density/opacity of the type to 75% gray. Then send one to the Piezo and the other put through his RGB/curves workflow. Hmm but even at that, one tone of ink is still not a good test of across-the-board quality. What if he superimposed white text over a step wedge? In that scenario the edge of the type would be defined by the response of the system at each tone along the way. Todd > Yes, but that's printing with quad inks, right? If so, then it is not the > same as printing with only black ink. Perhaps that's our misunderstanding. > Are you using multiple inks, or one ink? The Epson driver will print B&W > using only one ink, unless you are using color, which will print with > multiple inks. > > The resolution should be the exact same no matter how many inks you use, > it's the amount of tonality you can represent with how many dots (in what > area) that is the difference. With a single ink it takes more dots (area) > to represent a number of different shades, than with more different inks. > >> Austin, >> >> I see no difference in the amount of detail or sharpness in prints >> using MIS VM with the Epson driver in side-by-side comparisons with >> Piezo. I see this in my own prints and in examples from others. >> >> Technically I agree with you that you mono-ink print resolution may >> not corespond to 4 or 6 ink system resolution. >> >> But regardless of the ins and outs of the drivers, the end results >> are equally excellent. >> >> Martin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography Review: Piezo v. Epson resolution
2001-10-10 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.