> From: Anthony G. Atkielski [mailto:anthony@...] > > Digital images usually do have a distinctive look, especially when > examined closely. The lack of grain is usually noticed first. The > "creamy" colors are noticed next. The two features of the images are > related, as part of the lack of grain comes from the fact that color > resolution in digital is very poor, and color pixels are interpolated. > In other words, you're unlikely to see pixel-to-pixel noise in the blue > channel of a digicam image simply because the actual blue pixels are > separated by three other pixels, so the intervening blue pixels are > interpolated, which always smoothes out any disparities. So you get > less grain, less color resolution, and a creamy appearance to the image. > Some people like it, some don't. It looks nice from a distance. > > A near-total lack of "grain" and a creamy, somewhat pastel > appearance to colors are typical of digital images. The lack of grain > is mostly due to low noise, but is also due to the poor color > resolution, as stated above. The creamy pastels are entirely due to > poor color resolution. I'm like to know more precisely what you mean by "color resolution" and "creamy pastels". The former sounds like something that could have a formal definition, but the latter sounds like something subjective that doesn't describe anything I've seen. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] (unknown) to Val digital vs film
2003-12-29 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.