Paul D. DeRocco writes: > I'm like to know more precisely what you mean by "color resolution" and > "creamy pastels". Color resolution means the finest details that can be resolved in an isoluminant image, that is, the finest _color_ differences that can be resolved. Only one out of every four pixels in a digicam image has any blue information; the same is true for red. Only every other pixel has green information. All the rest is an educated guess added by the camera software (or by subsequent processing of a raw image). This means that one- or two-pixel details in red and blue can't be resolved properly by a digicam, since only every fourth pixel even captures red or blue to begin with. One effect of this is that noise seems to be reduced, because one pixel is being smeared over four pixels. > The former sounds like something that could have a formal > definition, but the latter sounds like something subjective that doesn't > describe anything I've seen. "Creamy pastel" is just another way of saying a limited gamut and limited saturation. Again, this is a consequence of the use of a matrix filter over a single sensor. It would not be a problem with three separate CCDs capturing every primary color for every pixel, or the equivalent (like a Foveon, if it were ever perfected).
Message
Re[4]: [Digital BW] (unknown) to Val digital vs film
2003-12-29 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.