> Austin, I'm not sure why you are focussing on halftoning with black ink > only, when it seems obvious that the tests were done with two > different quad > systems (piezo and MIS VM). What I read, it was not stated whether it was one ink or quad inks, all that was said was using the Epson driver. That's why I asked for a clarification. Go back and read what I wrote please. I am not "focusing" on that, I was only asking what EXACTLY was done. What I was truly focusing on, was the use of a pure black/white lineart image to test out grayscale performance. That is not a valid test. > Given that, I don't see what you are > adding to > the discussion here. I don't understand why that matters...no offense meant, but because you don't understand it, doesn't mean that I can't post, now does it? As well as giving my opinion on the testing, I was also asking questions. There was insufficient information for ME, so I asked questions, as well as added some VERY valid points on what I believe are misconducted tests. > Others have pointed out that a better comparison of > the two systems would include line pairs of varying densities > (and now that > Paul has done a test w/ black on white, perhaps others can do some tests > with gray on gray and black on gray etc.) Er, no. That is NOT a "better comparison", it is an invalid comparison. Line pairs are only black and white, and that does not give any information on the performance of a grayscale image. > From what I understand from your posts, it seems that you may be > calling for > the same thing; if so, I suggest you say so, if not, then why don't you > propose another test that might clarify things. What I am "calling for", as you put it, is an accurate understanding of the testing that was reported on this list that I responded to (not the web site test), and the understanding that the tests, and the conclusions drawn, were, in my opinion, erroneous. And I gave an explanation as to why. That is what I am "adding to this discussion", and perhaps you don't understand what I said as well as my explanation. That's fine if you don't. As I do when I don't understand or question what someone else wrote, please ask questions, and I will be more than happy to explain what I said.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Piezography Review: Piezo v. Epson resolution
2001-10-11 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.