Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] 16 bits vs 8 bits' Thanks to Glen Mitchell

2004-01-05 by Austin Franklin

Hi Julio,

> I should say also I was amussed about the apparent 'controversy' over Dan
> Margulis' statements.  Guess that according to Margulis Abobe got it all
> wrong putting so much effort in 16 bit capabilities in their latest
> Photoshop CS.  For my part I hope to soon buy Photoshop CS from the money
> saved not buying Margulis' book.

For %99.99999 of all COLOR images, Dan is in fact correct.  This topic has
in fact been beaten to death.  The challenge to people who think Dan (and I
as well) are wrong, is to provide an image that shows you can't do the color
correction you want in 8 bit.  The only images people have been able to
provide that show this are ones that have been quite poorly scanned in the
first place, or were real horrible images to begin with...both requiring
very large tonal moves to correct.  When rescanned, correctly, the images
were able to be easily corrected using 8 bits/color.  For images that are
just bad in the first place, well, typically, even 16 bits won't save them
;-)

Again, this does not apply to B&W images, which is what this forum is about.

Regards,

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.