In my original post concerning the comparison of Piezo prints and Epson (driver) prints my chief concern was with what difference could be _perceived_ between prints made with the two drivers, given identical printing conditions. To be sure, "objective" tests require repeatable methods, but anecdotal accounts count for something too. If a dozen reputable people tell me that they can or can't perceive a difference in revealed detail between prints (MIS VM quadtones vs. Piezo quadtones) made by the two drivers, then I think it's worth paying attention. We can then go on an look for "objective" verification, along with some kind of explanation. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> wrote: > > > Austin, > > > > I just tried printing the pattern with a midtone gray, and both the Epson > > and the Piezo drivers' performance dropped just slightly. However, on my > > system the Epson driver still looked better. The relative performances > > stayed the same. > > > > Maybe my 1160 is just weird. Why don't you try the test file I > > sent to you > > and see what resolution you can get out of your Piezo driver. > > > > Paul > > Paul, > > The test file you sent me only contains 0's and 255's. That contains NO > grayscale information. I really don't understand what valid conclusions one > can draw from this image that pertains to actual grayscale images, as > related to a system that is specifically designed TO print only grayscale. > > Austin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography Review: Piezo v. Epson resolution
2001-10-11 by flacita33@hotmail.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.