Why shoot B&W film at all if you know your output will eventually be digital? With a push of a button any color pic can be beautifully converted to B&W ( with the added benefit of any combination of filters in the channel mixer) . Why run around with B&W film in your camera and miss a potential color shot that only color film can do justice to. The only B&W film I still shoot is ISO 3200. K.Monroe --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@y...> wrote: > All 100 speed films scan pretty well, but in my experience, only the > 400 C-41 films scan well at that speed with this scanner (I've yet to > see anyone's 35mm Tri-X scanned really well on any home scanner > though... which is a shame, because I love Tri-X). I would suggest > Tmax100 or Delta Pro 100 as good starting 35mm films. Both can > easily be pushed to 200, scan well and are very forgiving. D76/ID11 > are good starting developers for almost all films, though XTOL is > good for pushing. Lots of people have different opinions on film > choices and these are just my recommendations:) > > Have fun! > > mark > > PS For scanning, I am currently enjoying Kodak T400CN a lot. I get > sleaved negatives and an index print for only $3.99 which I think is > a great bargain. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Sam McCandless > <samcc@v...> wrote: > > At 6:32 PM +0000 1/6/04, Mark Hahn wrote: > > >I think you will do much better with a Minolta Scan Dual II or III > > >for b&w 35mm, but the Epson flatbeds do very well with medium and > > >large format... ok, I also thought the thread was on digital b&w, > but > > >if we go into film a great starter 35mm camera would be one of the > > >Rebels with some good primes... > > > > and which B&W film for starters? > > -- > > Sam
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Good camera for B&W
2004-01-07 by digikdm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.