I am happier with "true b&w" at ISO 100 than with ISO 100 color film. I am also happier with T400CN (or PortaBW) film than color ISO 400 film. I almost never make color prints, but it is true that you have more flexiblity shooting color... I recently was unable to print a b&w shot that could easily have been fixed if I only had access to the color data and was able to mix my colors differently than the film had done. I am currently shooting Techpan (@80 in TD-3) for super finegrained b&w images and T400CN as my fast film. No color film can come close to Techpan IMO. (Didn't I already say that there would be opinions that differed from mine? :) mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "digikdm" <monroekd@h...> wrote: > Why shoot B&W film at all if you know your output will eventually be > digital? With a push of a button any color pic can be beautifully > converted to B&W ( with the added benefit of any combination of > filters in the channel mixer) . Why run around with B&W film in your > camera and miss a potential color shot that only color film can do > justice to. The only B&W film I still shoot is ISO 3200. > K.Monroe > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Hahn" > <markhahn2000@y...> wrote: > > All 100 speed films scan pretty well, but in my experience, only > the > > 400 C-41 films scan well at that speed with this scanner (I've yet > to > > see anyone's 35mm Tri-X scanned really well on any home scanner > > though... which is a shame, because I love Tri-X). I would suggest > > Tmax100 or Delta Pro 100 as good starting 35mm films. Both can > > easily be pushed to 200, scan well and are very forgiving. > D76/ID11 > > are good starting developers for almost all films, though XTOL is > > good for pushing. Lots of people have different opinions on film > > choices and these are just my recommendations:) > > > > Have fun! > > > > mark > > > > PS For scanning, I am currently enjoying Kodak T400CN a lot. I > get > > sleaved negatives and an index print for only $3.99 which I think > is > > a great bargain. > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Sam McCandless > > <samcc@v...> wrote: > > > At 6:32 PM +0000 1/6/04, Mark Hahn wrote: > > > >I think you will do much better with a Minolta Scan Dual II or > III > > > >for b&w 35mm, but the Epson flatbeds do very well with medium and > > > >large format... ok, I also thought the thread was on digital > b&w, > > but > > > >if we go into film a great starter 35mm camera would be one of > the > > > >Rebels with some good primes... > > > > > > and which B&W film for starters? > > > -- > > > Sam
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Good camera for B&W
2004-01-07 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.