On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 23:16, Paul Roark wrote: > I want to correct and expand on my original posting on this InkJetMall test. > > The question was: > > >> Is there any comparisons available that shows the longevity of > >>Ultrachrome inks vs. Carbon Inks such as f.ex. MIS Quadtones? > > >Inkjet mall's website has a comparative analysis of Ultrachrome, > >various Piezotone (carbon) inks , Sundance and MIS-FS inks based on > >1000 hr xenon lamp tests. ... Here's the link: > > >http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/info/1000-hours.html <Really large snip> I tend to trust IJMs numbers more than Whilhelm's myself, just because IJM is so over the top with the xenon lights. You can't say that are holding back the light! But neither test is likely to represent the real world in any significant way. Your argument sounds like an argument for an actual standardized test, and actual standardized testing. What a concept! ASTM would be my choice. I wonder if they are even looking at it? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ultrachrome vs. Carbon ink durability
2004-01-08 by hogarth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.