because I don't have to enlarge as much with a 4x5 neg scan so minor changes in sharpness aren't as noticable, in fact they will usually be washed out in the final downsample. From a 4x5 negative I usually downsample by at least half the scanned resolution anyway to print as well so the sharpness loss is less than the loss due to downsampling (if I don't do it the printer will since it can only handle 360ppi). mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, David Jackson <lagniap@t...> wrote: > At 04:55 PM 1/9/04 +0000, Mark wrote: > > ><snip>with 4x5" I don't worry about getting my film at the sweet spot > >either, but for 35mm it would be manditory and even with MF I think > >it makes some real difference in the results. <snip> > > > Mark, I don't get this. Why is it less important with 4x5 negs? > > Many Thanks, David
Message
[Digital BW] Epson 2450 - negs on glass [was:Re: Scanning Tri-X]
2004-01-09 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.