> Austin, > > So are you saying that all these Epson injet printers, even when using > Piezography (drivers(software) and technology(hardware + software)) > are actually just printing a good algorithm of a halftone method? Any time you are simulating continuous tone with solid ink colors, I'd call it halftone. > Does dot size count at all? How about variability of frequency of > dots within a square inch (or any size area)? Sure to both. > In the book "Adobe > Photoshop for Photographers" by Martin Evening, he cites that "The > line screen resolution (lpi) is the frequency of halftone dots or > cells per inch." That implies to me that halftone frequency is fixed. For that particular halftone it sounds like it. > Isn't it true that in stochastic methods, the frequency is variable? I don't believe that only stochastic methods vary the frequency... Stochastic only means "involving chance or probability", as in random. You can vary the frequency, and not be random...it can be very deterministic (opposite of random).
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Halftones was Piezography Review
2001-10-11 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.