Yes. 10D. With either full jpeg -> b&w or RAW -> b&w. You should have no problem. The only thing I can suggest is that Paul's curves are not perfect and by doing minor curve adjustments you can sometimes shift critical transitions to better tonal regions and get better prints. The other option is to choose a different curve set (ie. if you are using the original 1160 curves try using the new UT curves... since the difficult tranisitions are at different locations with each set it might fix it). Shadows are always going to be the weakest point using your setup IMHO. Looking at two photos now, one from a digital and a second from film scan and see that the posterization in the shadows does appear more obvious in the digital, but I believe it is only because the digital is so much smoother. The grain pattern in the shadows of the film scan kind of breaks up the posterization and make it less obvious. I have never been entirely satisfied with quadtone shadow detail though, I think it is just a limitation to the printer/ink/driver/paper combination... To see the limitations of your printer space I would suggest printing out a 4x6" smooth gradient from black to white... it really surprised me how wavy the tonal space of my 1160 really was and that I was able to still get so many good prints out of it... also made me realize why heavily textured images printed out so much better than some with smooth tonal gradiations... "a man's gotta know his limitations" [Clint Eastwood] :) mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sceptre12345" <am1000@v...> wrote: > Jake, > Conversion to b&w is done in Photoshop only. No conversion is done in > camera. > > Anyone else getting great b&w prints from 6mb Canon DLSR ? > > Thanks, > Andre > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jake Hellbach" > <jake@j...> wrote: > > Hi, > > Are you setting your camera to b/w mode or converting the color > photo to b/w > > in Photoshop? > > I use a Fuji S2 and experimented setting it in b/w mode. The > resulting > > photos didn't have much contrast. > > Now I keep the camera in color mode and RAW. The rest of my > workflow is just > > as yours, except I use a 1280. I convert to b/w in Photoshop and > the prints > > look great. > > Jake > > > > Jake Hellbach Photography > > www.jakehellbachphoto.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sceptre12345 [mailto:am1000@v...] > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been printing some digital camera (6mp dslr) pictures lately > and > > they all seem to have the same problem: the shadows posterize. > This > > is one problem I have not had with scanned negatives. > > > > I dont know where this come from. Is it noise or something else ? > I > > have tried some noise software but it give the picture a plasticky > > artificial look. > > > > Workflow: Open the file in Photoshop 7 with the RAW plug-in, > convert > > to 16 bits and do all other adjustements in Photoshop. > > > > Printer: Epson 1160, UT inkset and Paul's curve. > > > > Thank in advance, > > Andre > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: B&W with DSLR : Posterization problem
2004-01-28 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.