I agree that it's a serious problem, made worse by various reports, some widely accepted and some constantly argued, about fading and color shifts; even on this list and in the past couple of days, we've had discussions about whether Piezo prints are brown or neutral or oyster. We've had things like Epson's 200-year color turning out to be more like four to six weeks if you have any ozone around, or maybe it's fly-spray or something else in the air. To have people say that this can be cured by a committment to reprint doesn't solve the problem: a lot of collectors buy only "vintage" prints, because that reflects the state of the artist's mind at the time he or she made the original photograph; anything printed years later is not only essentially different, but (and this is important to many collectors) worth less. There's also the problem that a collector might wonder whether he can even *find* the photographer two years later, when he's looking at a badly faded photograph; why should he have to pay good money to go through all of that? I think it's essential that the Piezo folks and the people at MIS hire a serious independent or university lab to do some serious, extensive *scientific* testing using *serious* equipment and rigorous, repeatable procedures, to tell us what we have, even if it's done only with a limited range of papers and for very specific formulations of ink. At least we would have a baseline. People have noted that some Piezo looks brown and other people have complained about "getting the greens" and we don't know if this is actually happening, or if somebody had a four martinis last night and is looking at the prints through bloodshot eyes, or, for that matter, if the Piezo people have quietly reformulated the ink or the ink factory may have had some quality control problems. For amateurs (and I'm using this in the best sense of the word, recognizing that some amateurs do exquisite work) it may not matter, and some may make print after print of one neg, over may years, and enjoy the evolution of the work. Professionals don't have the same luxury; if you're trying to make a living selling fine-art prints, you oughta, as the man says, be able to look the buyer in the eye as you're taking the check, knowing that you've given them a real piece of craftsmanship that will last a while. You can do that if you make a good silver print or platinum print, and follow established procedures. In reasonable conditions, the print will last a century or more. JC
Message
Re: A Call for Standards (Permanence/Stability)
2001-10-13 by jcamp@mr.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.