--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tim Goodwin <tgvoz@p...> wrote: > I should also add that I currently use Genuine Fractals to > enlarge my scans to 13x19 before printing and unless I > discover a reason not to would probably do the same with the > scans from the Nikon. So, I would be using the 4000dpi scan > mode simply for getting the highest resolution scan without > regard for enlarging. One of my reasons for choosing Minolta's 5400 for my scanning work several months back (in spite of already hearing rumors of Nikon's revamped line being on its way) was the prospect of largely, if not entirely, eliminating "interpolate" from my day-to-day work regimen, as I strongly feel that *no* interpolation beats any form of interpolation, whichever algorithm one chooses. So far I think I've largely accomplished this, and have been happy with the results. This is not to say the Nikon can't do the job for you, and do it well. > I have investigated having a lab scan just one of my negatives > and they wanted $40., and there are no rental facilities in my > area. Such an investigation often tends to put the cost of a decent film scanner in its proper perspective, IMO. ;-) - Barrett
Message
Re: Nikon CoolScan V Sample B&W Scan ?
2004-02-24 by Barrett Benton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.