This seems way too simplistic to me because it completely ignores the aspect of "artistic feel" in the resulting prints. A target may be good for showing the dither pattern, general accuracy of tonal output for a given gradient, but actual photos are much more complex and have infinitely variable gradiations etc. not tested in this shootout. I'm not arguing against the findings since I've never used the Piezography system, and I don't doubt that it is very good, but don't have much faith this being the acid test for b&w print quality. mark [b&w shootout] > The guidelines were that each participant was sent a target and had > 72 hours to print > it=receive the CD-ROM test target file and print on Monday, ship it > back by Friday. No > other rules other than stating what printer, inks, paper, software > was used along with > the relative value of the cost of making the print. ...
Message
Re: B & W shootout at PMA and DIMA
2004-02-25 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.