Digital BW, The Print

Umm, I don't get your point... other than the wish to be bristly.  
No, I won't know if the Peizography is better than anything else that 
I have tried, but that is not to say that everything else is crap 
either, but I also wasn't asking about Cone systems was I?  If I went 
with a compatible inkset from MIS I could get the Cone IIC profiles 
if the Roark curves don't work out... but it isn't smart to just 
throw money at a problem, especially when the highest cost option is 
getting mixed reviews (ie. I've heard about and seen too many 
examples of posterization in cone prints to ignore).

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Richard" 
<richard@r...> wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@y...] 
> Sent: 27 February 2004 04:32
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] new inkset for 1160???
> 
> I'm not willing to pay for Peizography since I could almost get a 
2200 and
> IP for the same price. 
> 
> Then you will never know will you, and by the way you can purchase 
a lot of
> ice creams for the cost of a Piezo System, but you can't fuel a 
rolls Royce
> on ice cream now can you.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your 
responsibility 
> to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you 
are
> currently using to read this email. ]