Digital BW, The Print

Ok, everyone needs a timeout.


don
--- Richard <richard@...-bulldog.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@...] 
> Sent: 27 February 2004 21:17
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] new inkset for 1160???
> 
> When I went into quadtone printing I was more than
> willing to go with 
> PiezographyBW, but there where a number of people
> who had paid for it 
> and then ended up liking MIS better so it didn't
> seem to make much 
> sense to immediately spend as much money as possible
> without knowing 
> why when in the end I might also be more satisfied
> with something 
> else.  No, I am not more concerned with cost than
> image quality, but 
> I'm not a snob either.  I only care about producing
> photos that I am 
> proud of, no matter what the cost.
> 
> But are you using the best? With your attitude to
> the Piezo product you will
> never know will you now?
> 
> 
> Also, since you are implying that MIS inksets and
> workflows are 
> inferior to Cone and are only suitable for people
> "more concerned 
> about money and less about image quality" I have to
> ask you what 
> experience you have with the MIS inksets?  Which
> inks and what 
> printers have you used?  How long?
> 
> They are your words and not mine - my man you are
> condemning yourself with
> your own words, it matters not a whit or jot what I
> use and for how long,
> what matters is what you use, and why is that you
> ask, simply because you
> started the thread.
> 
> When the MIS UTFS come out are you willing to send
> me an example 
> Piezography print to compare with it?  I'd love to
> be wowed into buy 
> Piezography and would have no problem with the
> expense if it is 
> really that much better and would be help advertise
> the differences.
> 
> Certainly not, If you want to see the best results
> from Piezo then go to the
> source itself.
> Produce one of your own prints on those inks above
> then challenge Master
> Cone to do better. After that you will surely know.
> 
> Now then are you going to be objective or
> objectionable?
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is
> your responsibility 
> to maintain up to date anti virus software on the
> device that you are
> currently using to read this email. ]
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools