A filter would be more appropriate from my point of view... but thanks for everyone who made useful comments. If there is anyone with experience with both the Cone and MIS systems and can make intelligent comments regarding the benifits of each system I would appreciate taking them off list. thanks, mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "D. Hill" <hill14701@y...> wrote: > Ok, everyone needs a timeout. > > > don > --- Richard <richard@r...> wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@y...] > > Sent: 27 February 2004 21:17 > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] new inkset for 1160??? > > > > When I went into quadtone printing I was more than > > willing to go with > > PiezographyBW, but there where a number of people > > who had paid for it > > and then ended up liking MIS better so it didn't > > seem to make much > > sense to immediately spend as much money as possible > > without knowing > > why when in the end I might also be more satisfied > > with something > > else. No, I am not more concerned with cost than > > image quality, but > > I'm not a snob either. I only care about producing > > photos that I am > > proud of, no matter what the cost. > > > > But are you using the best? With your attitude to > > the Piezo product you will > > never know will you now? > > > > > > Also, since you are implying that MIS inksets and > > workflows are > > inferior to Cone and are only suitable for people > > "more concerned > > about money and less about image quality" I have to > > ask you what > > experience you have with the MIS inksets? Which > > inks and what > > printers have you used? How long? > > > > They are your words and not mine - my man you are > > condemning yourself with > > your own words, it matters not a whit or jot what I > > use and for how long, > > what matters is what you use, and why is that you > > ask, simply because you > > started the thread. > > > > When the MIS UTFS come out are you willing to send > > me an example > > Piezography print to compare with it? I'd love to > > be wowed into buy > > Piezography and would have no problem with the > > expense if it is > > really that much better and would be help advertise > > the differences. > > > > Certainly not, If you want to see the best results > > from Piezo then go to the > > source itself. > > Produce one of your own prints on those inks above > > then challenge Master > > Cone to do better. After that you will surely know. > > > > Now then are you going to be objective or > > objectionable? > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > --- > > [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is > > your responsibility > > to maintain up to date anti virus software on the > > device that you are > > currently using to read this email. ] > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. > http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
Message
Re: [Digital BW] new inkset for 1160???
2004-02-28 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.