With regard to the "dotiness" in the highlights, how would UT7 compare when used with QTR? Would using QTR make any difference at all in this respect? Thanks. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > >...one complaint users of ImagePrint have (other > >than cost) is "doti-ness" in the highlights. > > >... should we expect similar perceived dotiness in the highlights > >using the UT7 inkset (when it becomes available) as people complain > >about with ImagePrint? > > The UT7 inkset will have the same density light inks as the UT2. These are > lighter than the UC light black ink. I don't find highlight roughness to be > a problem with the inksets. > > >And if so, what would be the advantage of this dedicated B&W inkset > >over IP? (Yes, IP costs a lot, but that > >cost differential disappears when you take into account that you have > >to buy a separate printer for B&W to use any grayscale inkset). > > I think cost is still an issue. The MIS inks are cheaper than Epson inks. > > >Both can print on glossy or matte; > > IP can't print on both glossy and matte without changing the black ink; UT2 > & UT7 can. This allows the UT2 & UT7 printers to have continuous flow > systems, extremely cheap bulk ink, and still have both paper types > available. > > > both can tone B&W; both can produce neutral B&W prints. > > Does the current IP allow cold to sepia range in B&W mode? > > I suppose I'd like a printer that could to it all -- great B&W and color on > all media without changing the black ink. I expect it will be here > eventually, but I'll stick with the dedicated B&W for now. > > Frankly, I was surprised how many people seemed to be clamoring for a UT2 > version for the 2200, 7600, & 9600. I rather assumed the savings of the > 1280 would make it the printer of choice for the desktop, but the feedback > at the PMA was not that direction at all. For the large format printers the > ability to avoid ink changing seems, understandably, to be the primary > source of demand for the UT7. > > Then again there may be some B&W purists like me who want to avoid the > distraction of even having color ink available. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > For UT2 information, curves, and settings see: > http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Presumed Advantages of UT7 inkset over RIP?
2004-03-01 by luisvcool
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.