The dotiness of the highlights is mainly a function of how light the lightest ink is and what the smallest drop of ink the printer can output. So you'll get very much the same smoothness of the highlights whether you print thru the Epson driver with Paul's curves or with QTR. I think the advantage of QTR is that the workflow is simpler -- you just print grayscales -- and with just three basic profiles and blending you get 40 different color tones from neutral to warm to sepia. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "luisvcool" <lvictoria@t...> wrote: > With regard to the "dotiness" in the highlights, how would UT7 compare when used with > QTR? Would using QTR make any difference at all in this respect? > > Thanks. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> > wrote: > > >...one complaint users of ImagePrint have (other > > >than cost) is "doti-ness" in the highlights. > > > > >... should we expect similar perceived dotiness in the highlights > > >using the UT7 inkset (when it becomes available) as people complain > > >about with ImagePrint? > > > > The UT7 inkset will have the same density light inks as the UT2. These are > > lighter than the UC light black ink. I don't find highlight roughness to be > > a problem with the inksets. > > > > >And if so, what would be the advantage of this dedicated B&W inkset > > >over IP? (Yes, IP costs a lot, but that > > >cost differential disappears when you take into account that you have > > >to buy a separate printer for B&W to use any grayscale inkset). > > > > I think cost is still an issue. The MIS inks are cheaper than Epson inks. > > > > >Both can print on glossy or matte; > > > > IP can't print on both glossy and matte without changing the black ink; UT2 > > & UT7 can. This allows the UT2 & UT7 printers to have continuous flow > > systems, extremely cheap bulk ink, and still have both paper types > > available. > > > > > both can tone B&W; both can produce neutral B&W prints. > > > > Does the current IP allow cold to sepia range in B&W mode? > > > > I suppose I'd like a printer that could to it all -- great B&W and color on > > all media without changing the black ink. I expect it will be here > > eventually, but I'll stick with the dedicated B&W for now. > > > > Frankly, I was surprised how many people seemed to be clamoring for a UT2 > > version for the 2200, 7600, & 9600. I rather assumed the savings of the > > 1280 would make it the printer of choice for the desktop, but the feedback > > at the PMA was not that direction at all. For the large format printers the > > ability to avoid ink changing seems, understandably, to be the primary > > source of demand for the UT7. > > > > Then again there may be some B&W purists like me who want to avoid the > > distraction of even having color ink available. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > For UT2 information, curves, and settings see: > > http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Presumed Advantages of UT7 inkset over RIP?
2004-03-01 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.