Yes, I would have to say that I do notice this *slightly* when viewing the scan at "actual pixels". However, if I use the Grain Desolver (Digital GEM and ROC), any and all signs of the "pepper effect" or grain is completely removed. I don't know if using this feature can result in softening of the image, but I haven't noticed it. Then again, I haven't done any specific tests on it either. I can say that the prints that use the grain desolver show no signs of grain whatsoever, while those prints from scans where I didn't use that feature do show very slight signs of grain in smooth areas such as sky (but not in a bad way). --- Andre <am1000@...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > Max Clark > <bad2maxxx@y...> wrote: > > I am getting very good results scanning T-Max 100 > with > > my new Nikon Coolscan V, and printing with an > Epson > > 1280 with MIS UT2 inks. > > Because of tis light source, the Coolscan are known > to show > the "structure" of the film, which result in a > pepper effect. Have > you noticed this with T-Max 100 ? > TIA > Andre > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you\ufffdre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Nikon Coolscan 5000/V vs b&w films
2004-03-09 by Max Clark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.