>...Some of these samples I saw where done with Quadtone inksets and the >results were excellent. The problem is that excellent is not good enough >for me.... >I am not sure how many of you actually saw an original Ansel Adams or >Robert Mapplethorp print. This is the quality I need to achieve. ... Yes, I've seen AA prints, and I'm quite sure he'd be doing digital now. I did silver printing for years and will not go back to it. Digital is better in my view. Sure, the silver print has some characteristics that are outstanding, but what really distinguished AA and Mapplethorp prints, in my view, was the artistic skill of the individuals. I see digital B&W as still, primarily, B&W photography. A technically perfect print with either medium will be boring and not look like much if the printer (person) is not very skilled. Several years ago I concluded that my digital prints could hang side-by-side with my silver prints (under glass). Now I'm about to change that opinion. The silver prints usually can no longer make the grade. So, the skill of the printer is, in my view, the factor that I'd most worry about. I'd say it's time to start getting down that learning curve regardless of whether you decide to use it now or not. Paul Roark www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital output to match fiber based printing?
2004-03-13 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.